Saturday, 22 October 2016

Cyborgs, Race & Animé Adaptations: Discussing the Justification of Casting in 'Ghost in the Shell'

Upon announcement of the cast in Rupert Sanders’ upcoming American remake of Mamoru Oshii’s feature-length Japanese animé Ghost in the Shell (1995) – and especially with the release of a production shot depicting Scarlett Johansson as the lead character Motoko Kusanagi (otherwise simply known as the Major) – the project has become somewhat associated with the controversy of ‘whitewashing’ in contemporary Hollywood. Casting a white woman in a live-action remake of a Japanese property, as a character who is originally Japanese, has had some audiences accusing the filmmakers and Johansson of “stealing” roles from Asian actors. In order to amend the controversy, computer imagery was tested on Johansson’s character to make her look Asian. In theory, one could argue that audiences are concerned with the outward appearance of a character. However, this attempt only exacerbated the issue, so it was abandoned.

Of course, this is not the first film to be accused of whitewashing during this last decade. Most notorious among adaptations of animations are James Wong’s Dragonball Evolution (2009) and M. Night Shyamalan’s The Last Airbender (2010), respectively based on the Japanese animé Dragon Ball and the American cartoon Avatar: The Last Airbender (which drew influence from Eastern animation styles). It is not uncommon for audiences to sometimes fail to perceive that most animé characters such as those depicted in Dragon Ball and its sequel series are supposed to be or look Japanese, including those from outer space. Some don’t know unless they’re told. To Dragonball Evolution’s credit, it does cast Asian actors in the roles of Chi-Chi, Master Roshi, Yamcha and Grandpa Gohan, but audiences mostly take issue with the protagonist, the main character Goku, being played by a white actor (and depicted as a teenager). Some argue that since Goku is an alien he can technically be any race at all; that may be true, but at the same time one might ask if he can be any race, why not make him Asian like he is originally instead of defaulting to Caucasian?

The same has been argued about the Major in Ghost in the Shell – she may be a cyborg, but she is supposed to look Japanese; and if the setting of the film is an “international world” as Producer Steven Paul described it, with actors from several national and/or ethnic backgrounds, why does the ethnicity of the protagonist default to white? One familiar with the different Ghost in the Shell media and official resources will probably tell you that Kusanagi’s cyborg body may not resemble her original and that she has no knowledge her identity before – in the 1995 animé, Kusanagi speculates that her memory could have been erased – implying that the ethnicity of the character, in this case, is unimportant. But we’ll get back to that later.

In The Last Airbender, white actors portrayed Aang, Katara and Sokka (and an Indian actor played Zuko) even though in the cartoon they were supposed to look Chinese and Inuit (and Japanese) respectively. And in this instance we’re not dealing with aliens or cyborgs; Avatar is set in a world where these ethnicities make up the majority of the population in their respective nations. Also mentioned as an example of whitewashing is Joe Wright's Pan (2015) where Rooney Mara plays Tiger Lily instead of a Native American actress. However this may be an unfair criticism since no one seems to address the context of the film; the entire tribe is multiethnic, the Chief (Tiger Lily's father) is played by Jack Charles, an Australian Aboriginal man, and it could be theorised with some merit that the so-called natives of Neverland in this version are runaways from enslavement in Blackbeard's mines. These examples, along with Alex Proyas’ Gods of Egypt (2016) – based on Ancient Egyptian mythology – demonstrate a white protagonist or [most of the] main cast in place of characters that were originally other ethnicities like Asian, Inuit or Arabic, but where the supporting cast or background actors are more accurate or, failing that, diverse. Some attribute the failure of these films to ‘whitewashing’ the main characters. While some may have been upset, this seems like a dishonest conclusion; all these films were bad in their own right, because of quality and narrative, regardless of race change – in the case of those that are adaptations, because they misrepresented their source material also.

While American audiences’ reactions to the casting of Scarlett Johansson in the lead role of Ghost in the Shell have either been perceptions of blatant and offensive ‘whitewashing’ or attempts to analyse the reason behind the choice, the major consensus among Japanese audiences seems to be accepting of Johansson as the Major (as illustrated in the YouTube video ‘What Japanese Think of Whitewashing (Ghost in the Shell, Death Note, Interview)’ by content creator That Japanese Man Yuta), showing little surprise or objection, if any, to the casting choice. The only issue taken in these interviews was that casting directors should not exclude or reject actors because of their ethnicity, such as was the case with Edward Zo’s audition for Adam Wingard’s upcoming remake of Death Note. As commented in the video, one can see a resemblance between Johansson and the character.

Initially, one may feel it would have been more appropriate for an Asian actress to be cast as Kusanagi. However, one recognises the reasoning behind the decision and the nature of casting in transnational adaptations. According to animé reviewer Bennett White (a.k.a. BennettTheSage):

“Look, there’s been a ton of animé-based adaptations that have been stuck in development hell for God-knows-how-long because everyone and their mother has been scared to actually pull the trigger! James Cameron has been battling for over a decade to get a Battle Angel Alita film made, and Ghost in the Shell took seven years before principle photography even began. Cowboy Bebop has certainly been milled around too and Akira is infamous for being green lit, only to have production stop four different times! And don’t even get me started on Robotech!” (Anime Abandon: Speed Racer (feat. NOSTALGIA CRITIC)).

Seven years! It’s understandable that the creators, producers and/or studio would want to ensure the film would be as successful as they could, hence why they cast Scarlett Johansson, one of the biggest names in Hollywood. That’s not to say there aren’t any well-known Asian actresses in Hollywood that would fit the part. Personally, one would suggest Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. star Ming-Na Wen would make a good Kusanagi as she could easily pull off the character’s temperament from the animé and seems suited for martial arts and gunfire in the action genre. True, she is technically of Chinese descent and not Japanese, but if an Australian, a New Zealand citizen and an American can be the main trio of a musical set in Revolutionary France with no one kicking up a fuss, there should be no problem with Wen playing the Major. However, the difference is that Johansson is a bigger name and will draw a larger crowd, not excluding those unfamiliar with the animé in the first place. Given the track record of failures from previous live-action animé adaptations – such as the Wachowskis’ Speed Racer (2008) and the aforementioned Dragonball Evolution – and the time it has taken to get this remake into production, one can’t blame them for trying to make Ghost in the Shell as successful as possible.

Some audiences argue that the role should have been given to an Asian or Japanese actress because Ghost in the Shell is part of Japanese culture. An interesting thought, seeing as how Hollywood has made several remakes of Japanese titles in the past – Godzilla, The Magnificent Seven (Seven Samurai), The Ring, The Grudge (Ju-On), Django and A Fistful of Dollars (Yojimbo) – some of which are infinitely more iconic, and no one has had a problem with the casting of white people in the leading roles of any of these remakes. Is it because Motoko Kusanagi is a Japanese name? Sadako Yamamura, the antagonist from Hideo Nakata’s Ring (1998), is adapted in Gore Verbinski’s version (2002) to Samara Morgan (Daveigh Chase). Sadako in the South Korean version, Kim Dong-bin’s The Ring Virus (1999), is called Park Eun-suh (Doona Bae). The name is not sacred. It can be changed. And again, no one had a problem with it then, and Japan has no problem with Johansson playing the Major now.

And it’s not simply a one-way street. Japan has made adaptations of American films using Asian actors: Taro Otani’s Ghost: Mouichido Dakishimetai (2010), a remake of Jerry Zucker’s iconic supernatural romance Ghost (1990), and Lee Sang-il’s Unforgiven (2013), a remake of Clint Eastwood’s action movie of the same name (1992), which funnily enough reversed the formula used in some Spaghetti Westerns to turn an American western into a Japanese samurai movie. Their characters have Asian names. Even if they don’t it doesn’t matter. Shinji Higuchi’s Attack on Titan (2015) is a two-part live action Japanese remake of the popular animé series of the same name. Despite both the source material and the adaptation being Japanese products, all of the characters have/retain their European names, yet Japanese actors portray them instead of white people. Is America or Europe in any way offended by this? Nope!


Japan and America recognise each other’s main racial demographics, and so would expect a player from that demographic to play the part in a film from that country. The best way to look at the Ghost in the Shell remake is not as an example of Hollywood’s shortcomings when it comes to race, but rather one of several American remakes of a Japanese property, such as Gareth Edwards’ Godzilla (2014), John Sturges’ The Magnificent Seven (1960) or Gore Verbinski’s The Ring, created through fair acquisition of the rights from other studios. The decision to cast Scarlett Johansson in the lead was not to snub Asian actresses; it was simply so the film could appeal to as wide an audience as possible and to compensate for the project’s prolonged time in “development hell”. Therefor the film, when released, should be critiqued on its narrative and cinematic merits, and acting. To boycott this film based on Johansson’s involvement because she is white, as some may plan to do, would be prejudiced.

No comments:

Post a Comment