Roland Emmerich’s Independence Day: Resurgence is the sequel to his memorable 1996
science fiction film Independence Day,
released and taking place twenty years after said movie and its events. Humankind,
united in their common interests, pools their resources to combine human and
alien technology in preparation for possible future invasions – but the aliens
have advanced also. This seems like a logical concept for a sequel. Most of the
main cast reprises their roles, save unfortunately for Will Smith, one of the
coolest acting personalities of the time and one of the best parts of the first
film, while more characters are added as part of this 20-years-later scenario.
The first thing one might notice (besides
the futuristic setting) is the painfully on-the-nose dialogue. The
establishment of the new characters is far too obvious and unnatural, joking
one-liners are inserted in scenes that would otherwise be devastating, and the
new characters themselves are lazily created. Liam Hemsworth plays a clichéd
reckless rebel who realistically would not be employed in international
planetary defense. Jessie T. Usher plays the now grown-up son of Will Smith’s
character from the first film, an accomplished pilot following in the footsteps
of his late father – and that’s it. The film gives a brief backstory on
Hemsworth and Usher’s characters as an excuse as to why the two don’t like each
other, but the audience learns nothing about him because there’s nothing else
to know! One would think that Jeff Goldblum and the son of Will Smith from the
first film would be the protagonists together, but young Hiller is played like
a side character at best. In typical contemporary fashion, the film has Usher
quote some of Smith’s lines from the first film, but in such a bland and
serious way – what can one say but ‘Will Smith he ain’t’? And then there are
the roles of Travis Tope and Angelababy, which only exist to insert a romance
subplot into the film with no development whatsoever between the two.
The worst character that keeps popping up
is Nicolas Wright as Floyd. This character is persistently annoying and
contributes nothing to the plot to the point where even the characters tell him
he’s useless. And the kicker? Wright is also credited as one of five
screenwriters on this project, including the director and James Vanderbilt, who
wrote the much better Emmerich film White
House Down (2013), but is unfortunately also credited among the
screenwriters of the betrayal that is Marc Webb’s The Amazing Spider-Man films. The only characters through which the
audience can have any enjoyment are those of actors reprising their roles –
Jeff Goldblum, Bill Pullman, Judd Hirsch and Brent Spiner – mostly because they
are memorable from the first film, and at least this film presents them as
consistent continuations. However, the sheer multitude of characters can leave
the audience confused and the lack of focus on these characters, especially the
ones who are supposed to be important, begs the argument that the film would
have benefitted from a smaller cast.
As a sequel to a disaster movie, the action
and effects are a central convention to the genre. While the destruction of
buildings used practical effects and alien ships used CGI, the destruction of
places like London is entirely computer-generated. Now, one could argue that
these are simply updated effects for a new decade, and that’s a fair argument.
However, while CGI was relatively new and popular at the time, CGI like this
has become common, although one can appreciate the attention to detail. It is
an inventive scene where the alien ship, so large that it covers a fraction of
the Earth and has its own gravity, rips the city from its foundations and lets
it fall to the ground in a fiery cataclysm, raising the level of threat from
its predecessor, as a sequel should do. The action scenes have some form of
tension, and it’s nice to see the heroes fight the aliens on the ground as well
as in the air, even if the aliens aren’t made through practical effects or costumes.
The problem is when the characters start making light of disaster situations,
like with Goldblum’s line “They like to get the landmarks” when London is being
destroyed; this is extremely out of place when the audience is made aware of
how many millions of people are dying all over the world in that scene. They
also make somewhat of a joke during this part in reference to the nearly iconic
destruction of the White House in the first film; the alien ship looks like
it’s going to bulldoze the building, but all it does is knock Old Glory off the
roof. The tone is imbalanced.
The story has elements and even potential
plot holes that weaken it. For example, America has many aliens imprisoned from
the last ship; why would they not remove their biomechanical armour that
enhances their strength, durability and gives them mind control tentacles? Why
does the alien queen have a mouth and vocal chords with which she roars, when
the species is established to have neither of those things? Oh yes, there are
alien queens now, because the aliens’ telepathy is now made to mean a hive
mind, which this film translates to comparability to ants and bees like in
James Cameron’s Aliens (1986). The
queen even resembles that of the Xenomorphs underneath her armour, at least in
the shadows. Not only that, but they establish that killing the queen will win
the day Phantom Menace-style. At
least in the first film hacking the mothership released a virus into all the
other ships as to lead to their downfall. One would think the aliens would have
a chain of command to continue their invasion in the event that their queen
died. And then there’s the introduction of another alien species that just
seems out of place in a film like this, becoming a deus ex machina by the end
of the film. And of course, if the studio can exploit the nostalgia of ‘90s
children to get them to see this film, surely they can hint at another sequel
despite the lack of demand for this one after so much time.
On the surface, the initial premise of Independence Day: Resurgence is not a
bad one. However, even if the first film had its flaws, overall the sequel
jumps the shark. The editing is really no better than any other movie, though
one might notice some incoherencies in the cut from time to time. Its character
creation is weak and horribly clichéd, and considering the main characters of
the first film were basically a collection of stereotypes, that’s saying a lot.
The new characters that the audiences are supposed to care about have no
development, too much focus is given to useless side characters or
inconsequential subplots, and the new things revealed about the aliens make
them uninspired. Independence Day was
not a great film, but at least its characters, performances and creativity made
it memorable enough to leave an impact. Yes it looks familiar, but this film is
badly written, unoriginal, unfocused, and exhibits the laziness of contemporary
films that exploit and prey on the nostalgia of their audiences. Disappointing.
No comments:
Post a Comment